Small mosques,
mosque complexes (Külliye) and masjids
The
mosque was not only a place of worship for the Turks. While
monumental mosques surrounded by a complex of buildings
were built by members of the royal family, every district
was adorned with a mosque which had been built by a vizier
or couıtier and for which a foundation had been set up.
These small mosques, too, were surrounded by charitable
buildings, and not only did they bring prosperity to the
distriçts in which they were located they also became minor
centres of culture. Hafız Hüseyin Efendi of Ayvansaray,
who wrote a book entitled ",Hadikatü'1 cevâmi" at the end
of the l8th century, stated that there were about 450 mosques
in the area inside the city walls and provided a short history
of each mosque within the limits of his capabilities. If
we add the mosques in Eyüp, Galata and Üsküdar, and those
along the Bosphorus, the number reaches 877. In the map
of Istanbul's mosques, which was drawn up in the Mühendishane
in 1848 and published as a lithograph, the streets that
existed at that time are shown, as are the positions of
the 450 or sa mosque and masjids inside the city walls.
Of these mosques and masjids, whose names alone would occupy
a large number of pages, only those which are of architectural
and artistic value will be briefly mentioned here.
It is known that
as early as the Byzantine area permission had been given
for the building of a small place of worship for Muslim
traders visiting the city. However, this mosque or masjid
was not a permanent feature. It was sometimes demolished
or rebuilt in accordance with political fluctuations. Although
the Turks had a small mosque in Istanbul during the reign
of Bayezıt I (1389-1402) it is assumed that it did not survive
until the conquest. After the conquest, however; this place
of worship, which was of historical significance, was
zealously preserved. The statement that the Arap (Arab)
Mosque in Galata was founded by the Muslim army under Mesleme
when they were beseiging the Byzantine city originates in
a folk tale invented in later years and there is no truth
in it. Thus, the site of Istanbul's oldest mosque is not
known.
The oldest of
the mosques that were beginning to be built by important
persons after the conquest is the Sadrazam Mahmud Paşa Mosque,
built in 1463. This mosque, which was repaired in 1755
and 1827, is an example of the type of mosque with a dervish
dormitory, one that was widespread during the early Ottoman
period both in Anatolia and Rumelia. The Mahmud Paşa Mosque
was situated in the middle of a small 'külliye'. In the
small graveyard in its precinct is the incomparably beautiful
tomb , covered completely with enamelled tiles, of Mahmut
Paşa, who was executed in 1474. Only this, and the classroom
wing of the madrasa remain on the left. There used to be
a row of shops, which no longer exists, and only half of
its public bath has survived to this day. There was also
a commercial building known as Kürkçühanı (the Furriers'
Building). In architectural terms there is another, very
similar mosque in Aksaray, built in 1471 by the then grand
vizier, Has Murad Paşa who was also beylerbeyi (govemor
of a province) of Rumelia.This too, has a dervish dormitory.
In later years the walls between the sections were removed
and the space was added to the central area for worship.
This, too was the centre of a small 'külliye'. The madrasa
was demolished in 1938 and the adjoining double baths were
pulled down in 1956. The large graveyard within the mosque
precinct, the trees in the graveyard and the impressive
outer entrance all add to the beauty of this mosque.
The Davud Paşa
Mosque, built by the then Grand Vizier of the same name
in 1485, is a short distance from the Cerrahpaşa Hospital.
The central area is covered by a single dome and there are
dervish dormitories on either side. Although extremely valuable
calligraphy and decorations dating from the l5th century
were encountered in the course of the most recent repairs,
sufficient effort was not made to preserve them. This mosque,
too, lay in the middle of a complex of buildings. Apart
from the tomb of the founder there was a soup kitchen and
hospice, and a madrasa. Only the second of these is still
in existence. The mosque that was built in Üsküdar on high
ground overlooking the sea in 1471 by grand vizier Rum Mehmed
Paşa is brick-built and it a further example of a mosque
with a dervish dormitory. Here, however, there a dome and
a semi-dome over the area for prayer. The shape of the drum
of its dome and certain other structural components point
to a Byzantine influence that stem from the fact that the
person who had it built was a Byzantine who had been converted
to lslam. The tomb of the founder is on the outside öf the
wall containing the altar niche. The madrasa and public
bath of the complex surrounding the mosque were demolsihed
many years ago; however, the ruins of certain buildings
belonging to the same 'külliye can be seen in the immediate
area. The Candanlı lbrahim Paşa Mosque was built in the
(lzubçarşı district in 1479. This old mosque, which is made
of soft suıface rock, was a ruin consisting only of four
walls for many years, but it was recently rebuilt and restored.
Although the Firuz Ağa Mosque in the corner of Sultanahmet
Square, which;according to the inscription by the great
calligrapher Sheikh Hamdullah, was built in 1491, is basically
square in shape with a dome covering the central area, the
nearby Atik Ali Paşa Mosque in Çemberlitaş, built in 1496,
is of an entirely different architectural plan. The sections
over the area for prayer, which is roofed by a dome and
semi-dome, were not dervish dormitories as is sometimes
thought, they are part and parcel of the main body of the
building. In this respect, this little mosque is a small-scale
copy of the first Fatih Mosque destroyed in the eaıthquake
of 1766. The front of the madrasa on the other side of the
street was removed for road widening. The famous Elçihane,
which stood next to the madrasa, was used as accommodation
for visiting foreign ambassadors in the l6th century and
has been much described. in books of travels. It was demolished,
leaving no trace, some time after .1865 and the site is
now occupied by an office block. In front of the mosque
there is an open tomb which is empty and a large graveyard
around it; another outbuilding which lay between the mosque
and Çemberlitaş no longer exists. Another mosque built by
the same Atik Ali Paşa is the Zincirlikuyu Mosque to one
side of the Edirnekapısı road. It has six domes of equal
size and is rectangular in shape. It is a small example
of the multi-domed Ulucami, or Great Mosque, of an earlier
period.
From the reign
of Süleyman the Magnificent onwards Istanbul was adorned
with mosques, both big and small, of Sinan and other architects
who had followed in his footsteps. Care was taken to apply
different architectural styles and their walls were covered
with enamelled wall tiles from the lznik works, which had
reached its apogee in the l6th century. The İskender Paşa
Mosque in Fatih built in about 1505, the Bali Paşa Mosque
in the same district, (which, in spite of a number of erroneous
estimates of its construction date), is now known to be
the work of Sinan, and the Cezerî Kasım Paşa Mosque in Eyüp,
the construction date of which is not certain but is known
to be some time in the l6th century are all buildings with
a square central area for prayer covered by a single dome;
in spite of this, however, Sinan embellished almoşt every
corner of the city with many mosques in different styles.
While the Haseki Hürrem Sultan Mosque (1538/39), Sinan’s
first work, is a simple structure with a single dome, a
domed annexe was built by its trustee, Hasan Bey in 1612
and a mosque unique in Turkish architecture emerged. The
Hadım İbrahim Paşa Mosque in Silivrikapısı, completed
in 1551, is the first of Sinan's more elaborate medium-sized
mosques. This was followed by the Kara Ahmed Paşa Mosque
in Topkapı, which, judging by the fact.that its founder
was executed in 1555, must have built at around the same
date and was the centre of a large külliye . The new plan
applied was a bold step forward which resulted in a striking
work. The Sinan Paşa Mosque at Beşiktaş, built at about
the same time, the Rustem Paşa Mosque at Eminönü (circa
1560), which is one of the great works of Turkish art because
of the magnificent enamelled tiles that adorn its interior
and even a part of the external wall of the exhedra,
the Molla Çelebi Mosque (1561) at Fındıklı the Sokollu
Mehmed Paşa Mosque (1571-1572) on the seaward side of
the Sultanahmet district, the other Sokollu Mehmed Paşa
Mosque at Azapkapısı ( 1577-78), the Piyale Paşa Mosque
on the inner side of the Kasımpaşa Creek, now by the side
of the new boulevard, built in 1573-74, the Kılıç Ali Paşa
Mosque at.Tophane (1580-81) the Zal Mahmut Paşa Mosque at
Eyüp (1580), the Şemsi Ahmed Paşa Mosque on the seafront
at (lsküdar ( 1580-81 ), which, in spite of its simplicity,
is like an elegant ornament are all important mosques that
are the fruit of Turkish architecture in the l6th century.
Of these works we see for the first time facades enriched
by collonaded galleries in mosques of the archaic earlier
type which have a number of domes; in the Kılıç Ali Paşa
Mosque Sinan reproduced the plan of Ayasofia on a much smaller
scale, although it was one of his last works. In the Sinan
Paşa Mosque he produced a work resembling the Üçşerefeli
Mosque in Edirne. The Zal Mahmut Paşa Mosque, on the other
hand, is square with a single dome, marking a new aesthetic
approach as far aş the exterior is concerned. In the other
mosques, however, he has applied an architectural approach
based on a hexagonal or octagonal support system for the
dome, although the details differ in each case. This system
was first tested in the Selimiye Mosque in Edirne, one of
the great works of Turkish art. Although the Kazasker İvaz
Efendi Mosque, which surmounts the city wall in the Eğrikapı
district and is thought to have been built circa 1585 is
not considered to be one of Sinan's works, the verandahs
surrounding it (no longer in existence), the facade on the
entrance side resembling a wall with window apertures and
the four double doors could only be the fruit of Sinan’s
genius.
The above-mentioned
mosques are so interesting in terms of their architecture
and decoration that it is not possible to provide a detailed
commentary in the space available. Many of these mosques
do not stand alone but represent the centre of a small-scale
'külliye', or complex of charitable buildings.
The master craftsmen
of the Turkish classical period who kept the traditions
of Sinan alive produced mosques and small charity complexes
of the same style in Istanbul. Although the number of these
works decreased somewhat in the l7th century, a certain
number of them were still built. The Çinili Mosque in Üsküdar,
built for Mahpeyker Kösem Sultan in 1640 is, as its name
implies (note: 'çinili' means 'with enamelled tiles'), famous
for the tiles which cover its walls, although the scale
of the mosque itself is modest. The mosque built by grand
vizier Cerrah Mehmet Paşa in 1593 is similar to the type
created by Sinan. A mosque built by grand vizier Mesih Mehmet
Paşa in the Fatih district in 1586 is remarkable for its
enamelled tiles and embellished marble and, in terms of
its proportions, is a bold statement and a great work. The
Mehmet Ağa Mosque in the Çarşamba district, which also has
beautiful tiles, is known to have been built in 1585 by
the architect. Davud Ağa. The Nişancı Mehmet Paşa Mosque
(1589) was also the work of the same architect.
It can be observed
that the classrooms of some of the madrasas built near main
roads in l7th century Istanbul were intended to fulfil thefunctions
of a mosque. This approach was applied in Sinan's Sultan
Selim Madrasa (1562); this work stands in what was formerly
the Yenibahçe district, now Vatan Avenue and has, because
of ignorant town planning been half buried in earth. The
same approach can be seen in the Köprülu Madrasa opposite
Çemberlitaş (1661); the Merzifonlu Kara Mustafa Paşa Madrasa
in nearby Çarşıkapı (completed in 1690) and the Amcazade
Hüseyin Paşa Madrâsa (1700) in the Saraçhanebası neighbourhood
of Fatih. In example of a work of this kind, which combines
mosque, madrasa and even library is the Nevşehirli İbrahim.
Paşa 'külliye', built by the then grand vizier; it is enriched
with a public fountain, charity fountain, a graveyard within
the precincts and even a bazaar, and is located in the Şehzadebaşı
district of the city. The mosque in this complex, built
in 1720 in the Tulip Period, when the principles of classical
Turkish architecture were still adhered to, is a small and
simple building with the symmetry of the library in its
general composition. The madrasa, which was a ‘darülhadis’,
or seminary in which the religious tradition of the Prophet
was taught, surrounded these two charitable buildings and
two rows of shops were built on the outside, although only
one row now remains. Originally there was a colonnade in
front of these shops which led to Direklerarası Square.
The same tradition was pursued in the Seyyit Hasan Paşa
Madrasa Mosque (1745), which lies next to the Faculty of
Arts. lt stands on an elevated basement and the section
adjacent to the street is in the foım of a domed mosque.
In the same year Hacı Beşir Ağa, the person in charge
of the Harem,had a charity complex consisting of a dervish
convent, boys’ school, public and charity fountain and madrasa
built in the Sirkeci district in 1745. This complex was
Baroque in style and it can be seen that here, too, the
mosque and the madrasa have been combined.
The biggest mosque
complex to be built in Istanbul in the l8th century was
that of the then grand vizier, Hekimoğlu Ali Paşa (1732-1734),in
the Altımermer district. It resembles the royal mosques
in terms of its dimensions and impressiveness. The dome
support system is hexagonal, and in this respect it resembles
the Cerrahpaşa Mosque In the interior decoration of this
mosque, which is the last important example of the survival
of classical Turkish art in the details, enamelled tiles
produced in the tile workshop of the Tekfur Palace (founded
in 1724) were used. However, these tiles cannot be compared
with the ones produced in the lznik workshop in the l6th
century as far as colour, design and technique are concerned.
Inside the complex, which is surrounded by a large courtyard,
is the tomb of its founder (d. 1758) and public fountains;
by the side of the courtyard gate there is a charity fountain
and, above the gallery of its second gate there is a library,
which is extremely successful in terms of architectural
inventiveness.
lt is a notable
fact that no other architectural project of any significance
was realised in Istanbul in the l8th century. The mosque
at the bottom of Alemdar Hill, built in the name of Zeynep
Sultan, daughter of Ahmed III, in 1769 is a mixture of brick
and stone; it is the most important of the Western-inspired
works of that period. A mosque standing at the side of Atatürk
Boulevard, built by Fatma Şebsafa Kadın, one of the favourites
of Abdülhamid I, in 1789, was in fact built in the memory
of Crown Prince Mehmed. This single-domed mosque in fact
stood extremely high from the ground but due to the fact
that the level of the surrounding ground was raised during
the construction of Atatürk Boulevard, the shops in its
basement are now below ground level. The courtyard gate
and the fountains on either side were subsequently removed
and reinstated on the upper storey. An interesting feature
of this mosque, which is Baroque in terms of its style and
proportions, is the covered area above the exhedra.
In the l9th
century, when styles originating in the West were predominant
in architecture, mosques were built, mainly by the Balian
family of architects, which had no relationship whatsoever
with classical Turkish art. Some of them were built to replace
older mosques and others were entirely new. In the Çırağan,
or Küçük Mecidiye Mosque, built for Sultan Abdülmecid in
1843 by Nikogos Balian (1826-1858) by the entrance to Yıldız
Park, we see a square plan covered by a single dome with
a royal pavilion over the exhedra. The style of the gallery
on its minaret is very different; it is covered, with slender
columns,and rests on neo-gothic arches. The same style can
again be observed in the mosque of the Çağlayan Summerhouse,
which stands on the site of the old Sâdâbâd Palace at Kâğıthane.
The architect in this case was Sarkis Balian (1835-1899).
This eclectic style led to a number of mosques that were
very different in style being built in the second half of
the l9th century. The Teşvikiye Mosque in the Maçka district,
built in the reign of Abdülmecid (1854-1865), underwent
certain alterations in 1892; it is a building inspired by
ancient art embodying acroteria taken from the art of the
Early Ages. The last examples of this eclectic style are
the Asariye Mosque in Beşiktas and the Cihangir Mosque on
the high ground above Fındıklı.
Other examples
of this mixed style are the Bab-ı âli Mosque, achieved
by renewing a small, older mosque (formerly the Nallı Masjid)
on the corner near the Governor's Office (1866), the Ali
Paşa Mosque (formerly the Ağa Mosque), built in 1867-68
next to the Ali Paşa mansion at the top of Mercan Hill,
the Fuad Paşa Mosque (formerly the Uzun Şüça Mosque), built
on octagonal lines circa 1850 in Sultanahmet, the Hidâyet
Mosque at Bahçekapı in the Sirkeci district, renewed by
Abdülhamid II in 1887-88. The Karaköy Mosque , built in
1903 at the head of the bridge in Karaköy by the Italian
architect Raimondo D'Aronco (1857-1932) reflected to some
extent the Art Nouveau style that was fashionable in the
West at that time. The exterior of the building was
original in apyearance, particularly as far as its dome
and minaret were concerned and its facades were entirely
faced with marble. Unfortunately it was dismantled in 1958
with the intention of moving it to Kınalı Island, but was
destroyed in the process.
The number of
small, local mosques that were built by wealthy merchants
and shopkeepers in almost every part of the city and had
foundations set up for them is by no means small. Many were
damaged by the fires that swept through large parts of the
city and subsequently renewed in a different architectural
style. Others have been demolished to make way for “developments”.
While in recent years some of these ruined masjids were
rebuilt and restored to their original appearance others
were rebuilt in entirely different and unfortunately extremely
ugly styles. Almost all of these small places of worship
were endowed with pulpits by charitable persons in later
years and turned into mosques. A few examples of these small
mosques or local masjids which have retained their value
in terms of architecture or interior decoration have managed
to survive to this day.
The Timurtaş
Masjid in the Tahtakale district, which dates from the time
of Mehmet the Conqueror, is notable for the minaret in the
form of a balcony rising from one corner of its brick and
stone walls. A similar example can be seen in the l8th century
Beşir Ağa Masjid , which is within the grounds of the Topkapı
Palace. The brick and stone used in the walls of the Samanveren
Masjid in Uzunçarşı endow it with a graceful and pleasing
appearance;it is one of the most beautiful masjids to be
built in the l5th century and its minaret, the brickwork
of which is rather original, has a gallery. The building
and minaret of the Molla Hüsrev Masjid in the Vefa district
are archaic in style.lt should be noted that care was taken
to vary the style of the minarets of these small masjids
so that they could be easily distinguished. Thus, in the
Hacı Hasanzade Masjid, built by Mehmed Efendi, Chief Military
Judge of Rumelia,at the beginning of the l6th century, we
encounter an ornamentation on the minaret resembling the
flat-weave carpet motifs employed by the Turks ever since
they inhabited Central Asia, which was achieved by the skilful
use of brick and stone. Emin Nureddin Osman Efendi, the
Cadi (Muslim judge) of Egypt, who died in Şehzadebaşı in
1554, built the Burmalı Masjid; this small, square building
is made of brick and stone and the roof is a timber one
with tiles. Although it is a modest masjid, the body of
the minaret features spiral brickwork like that of the mosques
in Edirne and Amasya. The Hacı Evhad Mosque (1585) at Yedikule
is one of Sinan's smaller works. It is rectangular in shape
and formerly had a timber roof. It is obvious that at one
time the walls of this small mosque were covered with enamelled
tiles; its minaret is large in proportion to the building
itself. All of these tiles have been stolen because the
building remained in a semi-ruined state for many years.
If it is borne in mind that mosques of this type had domes
set in the ceiling that were not visible from the outside,
and that these domes were richly embellished with painted
designs and gold leaf, it can assumed that this mosque too,
possessed an inset dome of this type. The Hüsrev Çelebi
or Bezirgân Masjid, built by Sinan in the Altımermer district,
was one of, or perhaps the great architect's very last work.
It was built in 1586. The exterior of this masjid is simple
and unassuming but its interior walls are covered from floor
to ceiling with the finest l6th century tiles. The ornateness
of its walls would appear to point to the fact that it
once had a richly-embellished inset dome of the type described
above, but that this was probably destroyed in one of the
many fires that swept through the neighbourhood. Another
important work of this kind is the Takkeci (Arakiyeci) Ibrahim
Efendi Masjid which stands outside the city walls at Topkapı.
This small and unassuming place of worhsip, which was built
in 1591 or 1592, has a simple wooden roof. However, its
interior walls are covered with the most exquisite lznik
enamelled tiles and the richness and variety of the flower
and plant motifs to be encountered are indeed astonishing.
Here the inset dome survives and the ornamentation on
the marble pulpit and on the woodwork endows what appears
from the outside to be a very small and simple mosque with
the importance of a great work of Turkish art. The Silâhi
(or Sürahi?) Mehmed Bey Masjid, which stands next to the
zal Mahmud Paşa Mosque at Eyüp (this was, in all probability,
built by Sinan), could be considered an exquisite example
of l6th century masjid architecture. This very small, square
masjid is covered by a wooden roof; the skilful layout of
the courtyard, which contains a tomb, and the minaret next
to the courtyard gate are old features that deserve attention.
Coloured bands of brick and stone have been used in the
construction of the mosque and the minaret, which is octagonal
in form and has no gallery. A similar minaret, although
it is not particularly graceful, can be seen on the Semiz
Ali Paşa Masjid at Eyüp.
In the l6th and
l7th centuries some masjids were combined with a street-corner
fountain. These fountains were surmounted by a minaret consisting
only of a gallery. When Sinan built the Mihrimah Mosque
at Edirnekapısı the water issuing from its foundation pit
was piped to the Attar Halil Ağa (or Yenibahçe) Masjid,
which once stood on the site of the present Vatan Avenue.
It discharged through a fountain with two facades made by
a Christian craftsman who was Sinan's assistant. The fountain
was surmounted by a minaret gallery. A similar type of fountain
could be seen in the Özsüzce Masjid at Yenibahçe, which
is a masjid and minaret combined, and in the Gürcü Mehmed
Paşa Fountain (1625). Both of these masjids were demolished
during the construction of Vatan Avenue. Although the square
plan of the masjid built by Sinan in his own name close
to the same district was sinple in the extreme,it had a
minaret the like of which is to be seen nowhere else in
Ottoman architecture; the minaret was octagonal in shape
and had no gallery. The ezan or call fo prayer, was sung
through a small aparture. This important masjid was destroyed
by fire in 1918 and only its foundations and minaret remained.
It was, however, rebuilt in the 1970's. lt is indeed a great
pity that no information is available about the interior
decoration of this masjid, built by Sinan who created so
many works of Ottoman art, in his own name and as the beneficiary
of his foundation. A masjid that is very different as far
as its plan is concerned is the Tulumcu Hüsam Masjid, built
in 1630. The minaret surmounted a heautiful pointed entrance
arch right in the middle of its facade. This masjid, which
was pulled down and its stones sold in 1945, was rebuilt
between 1985 and 1988. However, because an outbuilding
resembling a modern two-storey house was built in front
of it this interesting feature of the facade and minaret
cannot be seen.
Several examples
of the small mosques built in the late Ottoman period are
the Derviş Ali Madrasa at Karagümrük, which although the
Baroque profiles of the windows in its chimney-shaped minaret
point to the fact that it was built in the l8th century,
may have earlier origins; the Adilşah Kadın Madrasa at Edirnekapısı,
built in 1805 (this was in ruins but was rebuilt and restored
to its former state in 1977) and the Hacı Küçük Masjid in
the Sultanhamamı district. Although the latter is umimportant
as far as its building is concerned, it has a minaret gallery
with gothic arches similar to the ones encountered in the
Çırağan Mecidiye and Çağlayan Mosque in the Kağıthane valley,
both of which were built by the Balian family. While the
Central Post Office was being built on the site of an old
masjid, the latter known as the Hobyar Masjid, was completely
rebuilt in accordance with the project of the architect,
in 1910-11. It is an experimental work of the Turkish neo-classical
period, which had begun at that time. The octagonal stone
walls of the masjid have Kütahya tiles on their exterior
and the minaret gallery is surmounted by a peculiar overhanging
structure the like of which can be encountered nowhere else
in Turkish art. Areas for public prayer were set up in picnic
places inside the city itself and on its outskirts, and
by the sides of main roads and foundations were established
for their upkeep. Uğur Derman has established the names
of about 130 of these small historic works in and around
İstanbul; however, almost all of them have disappeared.
They all had a carved altar stone facing the direction of
Mecca and a wall to denote their boundaries. A few trees
provided shade for these simple places of worship and there
was generally a fountain and sometimes a well nearby. One
of the small number of these areas for public prayer was
that set up by Ömer Efendi, Clerk of Works to the Navy,
In 1772 behind what is now the Fenerbahçe Stadium in Kadıköy.
There used to be such an area on this site, reached by two
steps from the road. It consisted of a level place surrounded
by a stone wall, a fine altar stone, a marble well head
and a drinking fountain with marble troughs on either side
where animals could be watered. The fountain had a baroque-style
marble plaque bearing an inscrip-tion and the latter was
in the form of a column. Next to this area for prayer, to
which shade was afforded by three or four old trees and
which had been envisaged as a mosque, were the graves of
Ömer Efendi and his family, enclosed by a stout wall with
iron railings on the top. Unfortunately this irreplaceable
work has been demolished and the trees cut down. Another
such open space for prayer is the Hisar Namazgâhı near Anadolu
Hisar, which dates from the reign of Mehmet the Conqueror.
This, however, has been restored in recent years. As it
contains an altar niche and a pulpit, it must have been
envisaged as an open air mosque. A larger example of this
type of monument was the Atıcılar Namazgâhı, or Archers'
Prayer Place at Okmeydanı. In this place, which was the
centre of Turkish archery and had had a foundation set up
for it by Mehmet the Conqueror, there was an area of this
nature reached by a flight of ten steps and it had a pulpit
made partially of marble. Unfortunately this historic monument,
which is of great value, has been badly damaged in recent
years by the inhabitants of the shanty houses that have
sprung up in the vicinity. On the back of a fountain carved
from a solid piece of stone in the shape of an obelisque
(also endowed by lshak Ağa Director of Customs who had
the magnificent fountain at Beykoz built), we see a relief
depicting an altar, which would indicate that this grassy
open space must have been envisaged as an area for public
prayer. Another such place is the one set up at the same
time as the Mihrişah Valide Sultan fountain next to the
Küçüksu Summerhouse in 1806. We can see from old engravings
that there was an altar stone on either side of the fountain.
On the side of the Karacaahmed Cemetery where the İbrahim
Ağa Mosque lies was the Saraçlar Çeşmesi Prayer Place, built
by Ahmed Ağa, Head of the Sadlers' Guild, in 1774. This
was done away with in the late 1950's to make way for a
new road. One of the oldest of these open air places for
prayer on the old Bağdad Road, which was the road taken
by armies and caravans going eastwards, was the Ayrılık
Çeşmesi Namazgâhı, set up by Gazanfer Ağa, Chief of the
Harem, at the end of the l6th century. Today only the fountain
survives. The same applies to the area at Bostancı known
as Çatalçeşme, which was also set up in the l6th century.
The majestic plane tree on the other side of the road was
cut down some time around 1990.
The fountain
bearing an inscription dated 1831 which includes the name
of Sultan Mahmud II, the altar stone and the tree which
go to make up the area for public worship known as Bostancıbaşı
derbendi namazgâhı and adorn the head of the historic bridge,
have been moved a number of times and have now been erected
in a rather random fashion at the foot of the tree can be
considered to have been saved. Another such important area
for prayer can be encountered is the one known as the Kavak
Sarayı Namazgâhı, which lies by the side of the road leading
down to the Harem Quay from the Selimiye Barracks. This
small work was erected by Musahip Ali Ağa in 1654 and subsequently
repaired in 1845 by Şeminûr Kadın; it bears all the features
of the Turkish classical period. It is one of the oldest
and rarest examples of the architecture of these open-air
prayer areas to survive to this day. In 1974 it was removed
from its site and again erected a short distance away, thus
being saved from destruction. The rear facade of the fountain
by the side of the Alemdağı road in the outlying Dudullu
district has an altar niche carved on it and a verse from
the Koran is inscribed on it as well, emphasising that this
is an area for worship. The origins of the fountain are
older, but it was renewed by Hafız Abdülkerim Ağa in 1730
and again restored in 1886-87 by Adile Sultan, one of the
daughters of Mahmud II.
The most interesting
site of this nature in lstanbul, which is at the same time
the most valuable in architectural terms, was mentioned
previously in the section about fountains. It lies in the
Kadırgalimanı district of the city and was built by Esma
Sultan, wife of Muhsinzâde Mehmed Paşa and daughter of Ahmed
III in 1779. This public square fountain has two facades
and a flight of steps leading up to the area for worship
on top of its cistern, and is the only one of its kind.
One of the last of these open-air areas for worship to be
built in lstanbul is the one behind the Valide Bezmiâlem
Sultan Fountain in the Maçka district, erected in 1839.
In spite of the fact that these small monuments all belong
to foundations and should therefore not be private property,
it is indeed regrettable that in recent years they have
been demolished with great rapidity to make way for filling
stations, car showrooms and blocks of flats.
Back to Buildings Constructed
after the Ottoman Conquest